Shared by Donald Trump's Truth Social Account—Anadolu via Getty Images Credit - President Donald Trump watches Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro's capture unfold in Washington, United States on January 3, 2026.

Speaking just hours after thesuccessful operationto depose Nicolás Maduro, President Donald Trump issued a stark warning: "American dominance in the western hemisphere will never be questioned again."

But the swift removal of Venezuela's president, and Trump's promise to "run" the country while extracting its oil wealth for the benefit of American companies, are likely to have ramifications farbeyond the Americas.

Venezuela's importance lies not just in its proximity to the United States, but also in its role as a geopolitical centre of great power competition. It is an energy superpower, a symbol of ideological opposition to the U.S., and it has forged close relations with its enemies. It has also witnessed one of the largest refugee crises in modern history—one that could worsen.

Read more:How the World Is Reacting to the U.S. Capture of Nicolas Maduro

Trump's Venezuela gambit has the potential to impact global oil markets, reshape great-power alliances, and undermine norms around sovereignty and intervention. Leaders of other South American countries, such as Colombia, Mexico, and Cuba, are waking up to a world in which their countries' sovereignty is not guaranteed.

Here are the ways Trump's Venezuela takeover could change the world.

Oil and energy dominance

The United States taking control of Venezuela's oil industry would, in theory, seem to be an economic boon for Washington. The country has the largest proven oil reserves in the world, and control of those vast resources should deliver both a significant financial benefit to the U.S.

But the reality is far more complex. Venezuela currently produces less than 1 million barrels of oil per day, or about 0.5% of global oil production, according toRasmussen.Of those 1 million barrels, the South American country only exports about half.

Its energy infrastructure has been hampered by years of sanctions, mismanagement, and a lack of investment after Venezuela nationalized its oil industry in the 2000s.

Trump promised in his speech on Saturday that American energy companies stand ready to invest "billions and billions of dollars" to rebuild Venezuela's oil infrastructure, butexperts warnit could take years, if not decades, for them to see returns.

One more immediate effect, however, is that the U.S. would seem to be on the verge of taking control of a major energy supplier to China. Beijing has pouredtens of billionsof dollars into oil-for-loans deals to secure a supply that is not located in an area controlled by the U.S. In that sense, Venezuela was an insurance policy for China's energy security.

Venezuela's oil shipments to China, its main buyer, averaged over 600,000 barrels per day in December 2025, constituting about4% of China's total oil imports, according to Reuters. Just hours before his capture, Maduro met with Qiu Xiaoqi, the Chinese government's special representative for Latin American affairs, at the Miraflores Presidential Palace.

The loss of such a crucial strategic energy partnership, one that was growing all the time, will be a strategic defeat for China and could provide the U.S. with leverage going forward.

In the short term, however, Trump appears to be trying to ease China's fears. In response to a question about Maduro's meeting with Chinese officials before his capture, Trump told Fox & Friends on Saturday: "I have a very good relationship with [China's President] Xi, and there's not going to be a problem. They're going to get oil."

Iran weakened

Maduro's fall will have a significant impact on Iran, a place where the U.S. has long sought to change leadership.

Iran has been a close ally of Venezuela since the early 2000s, when the countries were led by Hugo Chávez and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, two leaders who defined themselves on the world stage by their opposition to U.S. hegemony.

Caracas was Iran's strategic foothold in the Western Hemisphere, and a key partner in helping it evade sanctions. Iran has for years sent refined fuel, parts and expertise to bolster Venezuela's oil industry in return for much-needed financial support. Their partnership extended intomilitary cooperation, with Venezuela purchasingIranian drones and other weaponry.

That partnership could now be severed, further weakening a wobbling Iranian leadership that is under pressure since a joint Israeli-U.S. attack this summer, and ongoing protests.

Might is right

By any measure, the capture and detention of a sitting president is a norm-shattering event. Just as the Iraq War is often viewed as acatalyst for the collapseof the post-WWII rulers-based order, Trump's brazen capture of Maduro and his stated intention to control the country and its resources could spur another shift in how powerful countries operate.

Both Russia and China could take Trump's flouting of international norms as an invitation to do the same, or to continue doing so, in Russia's case.

While Moscow has already made its move in Ukraine, China has been threatening for years to regain control of Taiwan. The U.S. has repeatedly invoked arguments about sovereignty to dissuade China from doing so, but those arguments will now hold less weight.

American hemisphere

The capture of Maduro marked the Trump Administration's most forceful move yet in its pivot to projecting influence in the Western Hemisphere.

In the hours after the operation, Trump also gave leaders of other South American countries cause for concern.

During a phone interview with Fox News, Trump warned that "something will have to be done about Mexico," adding that he had asked the country's President, Claudia Sheinbaum, if she wanted help tackling drug cartels in the country.

Colombian President Gustavo Petro, whom Trump has also accused of being involved indrug production, also received a pointed warning from Trump.

"He's making cocaine and they're sending it into the United States, so he does have to watch his ass," Trump said.

For the Communist leaders in Cuba, the small island nation that has thwarted America's ill intentions towards it since the 1950s, the capture of Maduro is a threat to survival.

Cuba has long relied on Venezuela for most of its energy supply, and receives tens of thousands of barrels of oil at subsidised rates. Between January and November last year, Venezuela sent 27,000 barrels of crude oil and fuel per day to Cuba, Reuters reported, citing shipping data and internal documents from state oil company PDVSA.

U.S. sanctions against Venezuela led to a decline in that flow in recent months, but the partnership is credited with keeping the Cuban economy afloat.

Trump also warned its leaders in his Saturday press conference, describing it as "a failing nation."

"The people there have suffered for many, many years, and I think Cuba is going to be something we'll end up talking about," he said.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is seen as a key player in Trump's Venezuela move, has spoken for years of his desire for the current Cuban political system to be overturned. On the morning after the raid, he had a pointed message for its leaders.

"In some cases, one of the biggest problems Venezuelans have is they have to declare independence from Cuba," Rubio said. "They tried to basically colonize it from a security standpoint. So, yeah, look, if I lived in Havana and I was in the government, I'd be concerned at least a little bit."

Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina, was more direct: "Hopefully the end of Mr. Maduro's reign of terror in Venezuela is near, and then we can focus on Cuba, one of his greatest allies and one of the most oppressive regimes in our backyard."

Contact usatletters@time.com.

How Trump’s Venezuela Takeover Could Change the World

Shared by Donald Trump's Truth Social Account—Anadolu via Getty Images Credit - President Donald Trump watches Venezuelan President Nic...
Arizona helicopter crash kills 4 after hitting slackline in canyon

A helicopter crash on Jan. 2claimed the lives of four family members from Oregon in a remote area of Pinal County, Arizona. Officials said the aircraft struck a slackline stretched across a canyon just before 11 a.m. local time.

The helicopter crashed in Telegraph Canyon, south of Superior and about 65 miles east of Phoenix,according to thePinal County Sheriff's Office.

Search and rescue teamsreached the wreckage later that evening and confirmed four fatalities, according to the Pinal County Sheriff's Office.

The Federal Aviation Administration and National Transportation Safety Board were investigating the crash.

Who was on board the helicopter?

Family members have identified the four passengers as David McCarty, 59, Rachel McCarty, 23, Faith McCarty, 21, and Katelyn Heideman, 22. The identities have not yet been officially released by the Pinal County Sheriff's Office.

Public records indicate that David McCarty was the owner of Columbia Basin Helicopters, a professional helicopter service company based out of La Grande, Oregon.

The helicopter in the crash was an MD 369FF. It was not immediately clear whether McCarty's company or its aircraft were involved in the crash.

Mary Jane Heideman, Katelyn Heideman's mother and Rachel and Faith McCarty's aunt, told The Arizona Republic, part of the USA TODAY Network, that the loss of four family members has been devastating.

What caused the helicopter to crash?

An eyewitness reported seeing the helicopter strike a portion of the slackline before falling to the bottom of the canyon, according to the Sheriff's Office.

"Preliminary evidence indicates a recreational slackline more than one kilometer long had been strung across the mountain range," the Sheriff's Office said.

The FAA had been informed of the aviation marked slackline and issued a notice to air missions, or NOTAM, before the crash, the International Slackline Association said in astatement.

"No highliners were on the line at the moment of the incident," the association said in a statement. "We extend our deepest sympathy and condolences to all of those affected by this tragic event."

Federal aviation recordsshow that a NOTAM had been issued to pilots warning them of a "tight rope" obstruction in the area at the time of the crash.

The notice described a flagged and lighted rope within a one-nautical-mile radius of the site at an altitude of about 600 feet above ground level.

What is a slackline?

A slackline is a narrow length of nylon or polyester webbing anchored between two points to allow individuals to balance on or walk across, according toSlackline US, a nonprofit that promotes the sport.

Highlining is the practice of balancing on a slackline at great heights, including across canyons and between cliffs.

Where was the helicopter going?

The helicopter departed from Pegasus Airpark in Queen Creek, according to the Pinal County Sheriff's Office.

Officials have not released information about the helicopter's destination.

This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic:4 killed in Arizona crash after helicopter hits slackline

Arizona helicopter crash kills 4 after hitting slackline in canyon

A helicopter crash on Jan. 2claimed the lives of four family members from Oregon in a remote area of Pinal County, Arizon...
Maduro's case will revive a legal debate over immunity for foreign leaders tested in Noriega trial

MIAMI (AP) — Whendeposed Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduromakes his first appearance in a New York courtroom Monday to face U.S. drug charges, he will likely follow the path taken by another Latin American strongman toppled by U.S. forces: Panama'sManuel Noriega.

Maduro was captured Saturday, 36 years to the day after Noriega was removed by American forces. And as was the case with the Panamanian leader, lawyers for Maduro are expected to contest the legality of his arrest, arguing that he is immune from prosecution as a sovereign head of foreign state, which is a bedrock principle of international and U.S. law.

It's an argument that is unlikely to succeed and was largely settled as a matter of law in Noriega's trial, legal experts said. Although Trump'sordering of the operation in Venezuelaraises constitutional concerns because it wasn't authorized by Congress, now that Maduro is in the U.S., courts will likely bless his prosecution because, like Noriega, the U.S. doesn't recognize him as Venezuela's legitimate leader.

"There's no claim to sovereign immunity if we don't recognize him as head of state," said Dick Gregorie, a retired federal prosecutor who indicted Noriega and later went on to investigate corruption inside Maduro's government. "Several U.S. administrations, both Republican and Democrat, have called his election fraudulent and withheld U.S. recognition. Sadly, for Maduro, it means he's stuck with it."

Noriega died in 2017 after nearly three decades in prison, first in the U.S., then France and finally Panama. In his first trial, his lawyers argued that his arrest as a result of a U.S. invasion was so "shocking to the conscience" that it rendered the government's case an illegal violation of his due process rights.

Justice Department opinion allows 'forcible abductions' abroad

In ordering Noriega's removal, the White House relied on a 1989 legal opinion by then-Assistant Attorney General Bill Barr, issued six months before the invasion. That opinion said the U.N. Charter's prohibition on the use of force in international relations does not bar the U.S. from carrying out "forcible abductions" abroad to enforce domestic laws.

Supreme Court decisions dating to the 1800s also have upheld America's jurisdiction to prosecute foreigners regardless of whether their presence in the United States was lawfully secured.

Barr's opinion is likely to feature in Maduro's prosecution as well, experts said.

Drawing parallels to the Noriega case, Barr on Sunday pushed aside criticisms that the U.S. was pursuing a change of government in Venezuela instead of enforcing domestic laws. As attorney general during the first Trump administration, Barr oversaw Maduro's indictment.

"Going after them and dismantling them inherently involves regime change," Barr said in a "Fox News Sunday" interview. "The object here is not just to get Maduro. We indicted a whole slew of his lieutenants. It's to clean that place out of this criminal organization."

Key differences between Noriega and Maduro in court

There are differences between the two cases.

Noriega never held the title of president during his six-year de facto rule, leaving a string of puppets to fill that role. By contrast, Maduro claims to have won a popular mandate three times. Although theresults of his 2024 reelection are disputed, a number of governments — China, Russia and Egypt among them — recognized his victory.

"Before you ever get to guilt or innocence, there are serious questions about whether a U.S. court can proceed at all," said David Oscar Markus, a defense lawyer in Miami who has handled several high-profile criminal cases, including some involving Venezuela. "Maduro has a much stronger sovereign immunity defense than did Noriega, who was not actually the sitting president of Panama at the time."

For U.S. courts, however, the only opinion that matters is that of the State Department, which considers Maduro a fugitive and has for months been offering a $50 million reward for his arrest.

The first Trump administration closed theU.S. Embassy in Caracas, the capital of Venezuela, and broke diplomatic relations with Maduro's government in 2019 after he cruised to reelection by outlawing most rival candidates. The administration then recognized the opposition head of the National Assembly as the country's legitimate leader.

The Biden administration mostly stuck to that policy, allowing an opposition-appointed board to run Citgo, a subsidiary of Venezuela's state-owned oil company, even as the U.S. engaged in direct talks with Maduro's government that were aimed at paving the way for free elections.

"Courts are so deferential to the executive in matters of foreign policy that I find it difficult for the judiciary to engage in this sort of hairsplitting," said Clark Neily, a senior vice president for criminal justice at the Cato Institute in Washington.

US sanctions are a hurdle for Maduro's defense

Another challenge that Maduro faces is hiring a lawyer. He and his wife, Cilia Flores, who also was captured, have been under U.S. sanctions for years, making it illegal for any American to take money from them without first securing a license from the Treasury Department.

The government in Caracas now led by Maduro's vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, may want to foot the bill, but it is similarly restricted from doing business in the United States.

The U.S. has indicted other foreign leaders on corruption and drug trafficking charges while in office. Among the most noteworthy is Juan Orlando Hernández, former president of Honduras, who wasconvicted in 2024 for drug traffickingand weapons charges and sentenced to 45 years in prison.

Trumppardoned Hernández in November, a move that drew criticism from even some Republicans who viewed it as undercutting the White House's aggressive counternarcotics strategy centered against Maduro.

The U.S. had requested Hernández's extradition from Honduras a few weeks after he left office. After the arrest of Noriega, who had been a CIA asset before becoming a drug-running dictator, the Justice Department implemented a new policy requiring the attorney general to personally sign off on charging of any sitting foreign president, due to its implications for U.S. foreign policy.

Maduro may have a slightly stronger argument that he is entitled to a more limited form of immunity for official acts he undertook as at least a de facto leader since that question would not turn on whether he is a recognized head of state by the U.S.

But even that defense faces significant challenges, said Curtis Bradley, a University of Chicago Law School professor who previously served as a counselor of international law at the State Department.

Theindictmentaccuses Maduro and five other co-defendants, including Flores and his lawmaker son, of facilitating the shipment ofthousands of tons of cocaineinto the U.S. by providing law enforcement cover, logistical support and partnering with "some of the most violent and prolific drug traffickers and narco-terrorists in the world."

"The government will argue that running a big narco-trafficking operation ... should not count as an official act," Bradley said.

Tucker reported from Washington.

Maduro’s case will revive a legal debate over immunity for foreign leaders tested in Noriega trial

MIAMI (AP) — Whendeposed Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduromakes his first appearance in a New York courtroom Monday to fac...
Titans QB Cam Ward suffers season-ending shoulder injury in season finale vs. Jaguars

Tennessee Titans quarterback Cam Ward leftSunday's 41-7 loss to the Jacksonville Jaguarswith a season-ending right shoulder injury.

After the game, interim head coachMike McCoy told reportersthat Ward required more testing on his injury before the team could offer a precise diagnosis. The Athletic's Jeff Howe, meanwhile, reports thatWard sprained the AC joint in his shoulder.

The injury to Ward's throwing shoulder is cause for obvious concern heading into the offseason.

[Get more Titans news: Tennessee team feed]

Ward left the game after scoring a running touchdown on Tennessee's opening drive that stood as its only score of the game. He took a shot to his upper body as he crossed the goal line and went into the sideline medical tent after the play. He then walked to the locker room on the ensuing Jacksonville possession.

Cam Ward is heading back to the locker room after this Touchdown run.#TitansBrandon Allen will take over.Upper body injury is suspectedpic.twitter.com/PH81ofBwjJ

— FirstDownMedia (@FirstDownMediaa)January 4, 2026

Ward did not return to the lineup for Tennessee's next possession. His backup, Brandon Allen, took over at quarterback and the Titans eventually lost, 41-7.

Tennessee initially listed Ward as questionable to return with a right shoulder injury, thenruled him outbefore the end of the first quarter.

The No. 1 pick in April's NFL Draft, Ward had previously played every offensive snap of Tennessee's season.

While the 3-13 Titans entered Sunday having long been eliminated from the playoffs, the Jaguars had plenty at stake in Sunday's game. With the win, the Jaguars clinched the AFC South title over the Houston Texans. They still have an outside shot at securing the No. 1 seed in the AFC playoffs. They need the Denver Broncos and New England Patriots to both lose to do so.

Ward finishes his rookie season having completed 59.8% of his passes for 3,169 yards with 15 touchdowns and 7 interceptions. He added 39 carries for 159 yards and 2 touchdowns on the ground. He finished Sunday's game 3-for-3 passing for 52 yards with 2 carries for 11 yards and a score.

Titans QB Cam Ward suffers season-ending shoulder injury in season finale vs. Jaguars

Tennessee Titans quarterback Cam Ward leftSunday's 41-7 loss to the Jacksonville Jaguarswith a season-ending right sh...
Browns defense flagged on 2 straight defensive touchdowns for doing Marshawn Lynch crotch-grab celebration

The Cleveland Browns' defense had little to play for in Week 18, so the team decided to just have fun out there. That approach worked early on Sunday against the Cincinnati Bengals, though it came with a cost.

With time running down in the first quarter, Browns linebacker Devin Bush intercepted a Joe Burrow pass deep in Browns territory. While it looked like Bush would run out of gas on the return, he got a key block from Myles Garrett deep down the field, eventually making it all the way to the end zone for a 97-yard score.

When Bush got there, he turned around to face the pursuing Bengals and did the Marshawn Lynch crotch-grab celebration. You know, the oneLynch did after his iconic "Beast Quake" run.

The officials didn't miss a beat, and immediately threw a penalty flag.

CINCINNATI, OH - JANUARY 04: Cleveland Browns linebacker Devin Bush (30) reacts while scoring a touchdown during the game against the Cleveland Browns and the Cincinnati Bengals on January 4, 2026, at Paycor Stadium in Cincinnati, OH. (Photo by Ian Johnson/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

The touchdown stood, but the team was penalized for the crotch-grab celebration.

If you thought that was going to deter the Browns' defense moving forward ... you were wrong.

On the next drive, Cleveland forced a fumble in Bengals territory. Browns cornerback Sam Webb scooped up the ball and ran it all the way back to the end zone for another Cleveland defensive score.

As Webb crossed the goal line, he also turned around and did the Lynch celebration, immediately drawing another flag.

The Browns were again penalized for unsportsmanlike conduct. It was the second straight drive they were flagged with that penalty after that specific celebration.

[Get more Browns news: Cleveland team feed]

While the Browns getting flagged on both plays should not come as a surprise, the fact that the team immediately performed the celebration a second time should draw questions. The defense clearly wasn't deterred by the first flag, and didn't seem to care about picking up another penalty.

In the Browns' defense, neither penalty played a major role in the game. Those defensive scores were the only TDs Cleveland got in the victory.

The Bengals turned the ball over after the first penalty and were forced to punt on the team's next offensive drive after the second penalty.

Aside fromMyles Garrett's sack record chase, which he achieved, the Browns didn't have much to play for after coming into Week 18 sitting at 4-12. Does it really matter if they get penalized for excessive celebrations after scoring twice on Burrow and the Bengals?

Of course, it also helped thatCleveland went on to win the contest 20-18. While theBrowns face a lot of questionsthis offseason, the team's defense should return as its biggest strength in 2026.

Browns defense flagged on 2 straight defensive touchdowns for doing Marshawn Lynch crotch-grab celebration

The Cleveland Browns' defense had little to play for in Week 18, so the team decided to just have fun out there. T...
Royals extend manager Matt Quatraro through 2030 season

TheKansas City Royalshave extended manager Matt Quatraro's contract for another three years,the team announcedon Sunday, Jan. 4.

The extension will kick in with the 2027 season and keep him in the Royals dugout through 2030.

Quatraro, 52, is entering his fourth season in Kansas City. He led the team to 86 wins, a playoff berth and a wild-card series victory over theBaltimore Oriolesin 2024 before slipping back to 82-80 last season.

In three seasons under Quatraro, the Royals have posted an overall record of 224-262 (.461), with a 3-3 mark in two postseason series.

Since 2000, future Hall of Famer Albert Pujols' 101.3 Wins Above Replacement (WAR) leads all players, with Alex Rodriguez tied for second ways back at 89.7 WAR. See the rest of the top 25. 2. Alex Rodriguez - 89.7 3. Adrian Beltre - 89.7 4. Mike Trout - 87.5 5. Justin Verlander - 82.2 6. Clayton Kershaw - 78.1 7. Mookie Betts - 75.2 8. Max Scherzer - 74.7 9. Zack Greinke - 72.4 10. Robinson Cano - 68.7 11. Miguel Cabrera - 67.2 12. Carlos Beltran - 65.1 13. Chase Utley - 64.6 14. Freddie Freeman - 64.2 15. Paul Goldschmidt - 63.8 16. Joey Votto - 63.6 17. Roy Halladay - 62.4 18. Aaron Judge - 62.3 19. CC Sabathia - 61.8 20. Manny Machado - 61.7 21. Ichiro Suzuki - 60 22. Mark Buehrle - 60 23. Barry Bonds - 59.1 24. Evan Longoria - 58.9 25. Chipper Jones - 58.3

Top 25 MLB players from 2000-2025 ranked by Wins Above Replacement

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast.Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Royals, manager Matt Quatraro agree to multiyear contract extension

Royals extend manager Matt Quatraro through 2030 season

TheKansas City Royalshave extended manager Matt Quatraro's contract for another three years,the team announcedon Sund...
U.S. allies and foes fear Maduro's capture sets precedent for more American intervention

Bycapturing Venezuela's president, Washington sent shockwaves felt far beyond Caracas.

The United States stunned the world on Saturday by launching military strikes in Venezuela and seizing President Nicolás Maduro, swiftlyending his 13-year rulein an operation the Trump administration framed as a demonstration of American power, asPresident Donald Trumpboasted that the U.S. possessed "capabilities and skills our enemies can scarcely imagine."

America's adversaries heard him loudest.

Nicolas Maduro, president of Venezuela, in U.S. custody. (via Truth Social)

Russia and China swiftly condemned the strikes and called for the release of Maduro, who hasbeen brought to the U.S.to face criminal charges. Iran and Cuba denounced what they called a violation of international law, their objections carrying an edge of unease that they, too, could find themselvesin Washington's sights.

Even major European allies, more cautious and measured in tone, carefully signaled concern aboutthe operation's legalitywhile largely aligning with the U.S. on policy.

Taken together, these responses suggest the revival of old fears of American interventionism, prompting allies and adversaries alike to ponder where Washington might act next.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that Trump is fulfilling his campaign promise to "demolish foreign drug cartels" by going after Maduro. She said on X that the operation would "keep our citizens safe" in keeping with Trump's "America First" agenda.

For Tehran, the fall of a close ally comes as it grapples with internal unrest of its own, just a day after Trump warned Iran it could face U.S. action if protesters were harmed.

"The American military attack on Venezuela is a clear violation of the basic principles of the United Nations Charter and the fundamental rules of international law," it said in a statement published by Iran's semiofficial news agency Tasnim on Telegram.

Loud explosions, accompanied by sounds resembling aircraft flyovers, were heard in Caracas, Venezuela on Jan. 3, 2026. (Luis Jaimes / AFP - Getty Images)

In Havana, Cuba's leadership labeled the attack "state terrorism," acutely aware that both Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have openly questioned how long the Cuban government itself should remain untouched.

Rubio's "primary interest is in Cuba, not in Venezuela," said Michael Paarlberg, a senior nonresident fellow at the Center for International Policy, noting that Rubio sees Venezuela "as the chief patron of the Cuban regime."

Asked during an interview with NBC News' "Meet the Press" whether the Trump administration's next target is the Cuban government, Rubio said that "the Cuban government is a huge problem."

He said: "I'm not going to talk to you about what our future steps are going to be and our policies are going to be right now in this regard. But I don't think it's any mystery that we are not big fans of the Cuban regime."

"We are at war against drug trafficking organizations, it's not a war against Venezuela," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said of the intervention. "We are enforcing American laws with regards to oil sanctions."

While past U.S. regime-change efforts in Cuba have failed, dating back decades, Paarlberg told NBC News the Cuban government would still likely "be worried about something like a direct parallel."

The United States' traditional adversaries were not alone in their condemnation, with several left-leaning governments in Latin America warning the move risked destabilizing the region.

Brazil said the U.S. had crossed an "unacceptable line," warning the attack set an "extremely dangerous precedent for the international community." Other democratic leaders in the region, including Colombia's Gustavo Petro, Mexico's Claudia Sheinbaum and Chile's Gabriel Boric, joined in denouncing the U.S. intervention.

Legal experts alsoquestioned the operation's legality.

Venezuela US (Cristian Hernandez         / AP)

The use of military force to remove Venezuela's president is effectively a "kidnapping" and violates core principles of the United Nations Charter, said Mary Ellen O'Connell, a professor at Notre Dame Law School.

"If you detain someone unlawfully, if you take someone into your custody and you do not have the legal right to do that, then what else would you call it?" she told NBC News.

"The U.N. Charter makes it very clear that there are very few times when a country has the right to carry out military force on the territory of another country," she added. "And it never has the right to do that in order to bring an individual out to stand trial before their courts."

Many European allies struck a careful balance, nodding to international law but without dissent in an effort to avoid upsetting the U.S.

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said his country would "shed no tears" about the end of Maduro's regime before reiterating his "support for international law," without saying what that support entails.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz called the operation "complex," and said his country "will take our time," to evaluate it, while European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said she supported a peaceful and democratic transition of power, and that "any solution must respect international law and the U.N. Charter."

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said the military operation in Venezuela "contravenes the principle of non-use of force, which underpins international law," while Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said it violated international law.

But as reactions to the Venezuela strike largely fell along predictable lines, the precedent it sets has left others wondering how vulnerable they might be, said H.A. Hellyer, a senior associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, a defense and security think tank in London.

"European countries were counting on the U.S. and certain types of U.S. behavior that perhaps they can't do anymore," he told NBC News, noting that Denmark had been careful in its response because "they know that Greenland is in the firing line."

Trump aircraft in Nuuk, Greenland, with a pink sunset behind (Emil Stach / AFP via Getty Images)

Trump has repeatedly floated the idea ofbuying or taking Greenland, treating it as a strategic asset for the U.S. in the Arctic.

Denmark's ambassador to Washington, Jesper Møller Sørensen, shared what he said was a "friendly reminder" on X Saturday that "we expect full respect for the territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Denmark," pushing back at Trump-aligned figures who had raised the issue in the wake of the Venezuela strike.

Many of the reactions to the Venezuela strike, Hellyer noted, "have very little to do with Maduro and have everything to do with, you know, lining up with the U.S. on a particular issue." Europe, he said, was "expressing support for international law, but without wanting to be identified as opposing the U.S.," raising the question: "What's the point of invoking a system that isn't backed by the strongest power in the world?"

But recent history shows that even as the rules-based order struggles, the U.S. has frequently acted unilaterally, with the Venezuela strike reflecting enduring patterns of intervention in Latin America, according to retired Col. Gregory A. Daddis.

"In many ways, U.S. actions in Venezuela follow a long history of American interventionism in the Western Hemisphere," he said, "where we have argued that the Western Hemisphere, in its entirety, falls within our jurisdiction to protect U.S. interests."

U.S. allies and foes fear Maduro's capture sets precedent for more American intervention

Bycapturing Venezuela's president, Washington sent shockwaves felt far beyond Caracas. The United States stu...

 

HOT POINT © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com